An interrater reliability study of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form-II quantitative scoring system

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study provides information on the interrater reliability of the quantitative scoring system of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form II (LNNB-II). The accuracy of each rater following a training procedure was also evaluated. Six college students served as raters, and participated in a 20-22-hour training procedure. This training procedure utilized a protocol similar to one used in previous interrater reliability studies performed with Form I. Following the training procedure, raters were asked to score two videotaped LNNB-II administration in which a confederate portrayed test performance that was relatively straightforward to score, as well as more ambiguous test performance. Excellent interrater agreement and accuracy were found on the quantitative scoring on both tapes. Implications for training in administration and scoring are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kashden, J., & Franzen, M. D. (1996). An interrater reliability study of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form-II quantitative scoring system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6177(95)00018-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free