Lag screws for hip fracture fixation: Evaluation of migration resistance under simulated walking

34Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous mechanical studies concerning cut-out of lag screws for pertrochanteric hip fractures have relied on static or dynamic uniaxial loading regimens to induce construct failure by varus collapse and superior cut-out. However, the hip is loaded in a multiplanar, dynamic manner during normal gait. We designed a hip implant performance simulator (HIPS) system to evaluate lag screw cut-out under multiplanar loading representative of normal gait. Five surrogate pertrochanteric fracture specimens with lag screw fixation were loaded up to 20,000 cycles using a biaxial rocking motion (BRM) gait simulation protocol. Another five specimens were loaded using a standard uniaxial loading protocol. The BRM loading group exhibited combined varus collapse (5.4 ± 2.9°) and backward rotation (7.2 ±2.8°). The uniaxial loading group exhibited four times less varus collapse (1.4 ±1.1°) as compared to the BRM group, and only negligible rotation. For correlation of lag screw migration in surrogate specimens to that in native bone, six human cadaveric specimens were subjected to BRM loading. The degree of varus collapse (8.5 ± 7.7°) and rotation (7.2 ± 6.4°) in cadaveric specimens were comparable to that in surrogate specimens, with the surrogate specimens showing significantly less variability. The results demonstrate that accounting for clinically realistic multiplanar loading vectors significantly affects implant migration, and therefore should be considered when evaluating the fixation strength of hip screw implants. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ehmke, L. W., Fitzpatrick, D. C., Krieg, J. C., Madey, S. M., & Bottlang, M. (2005). Lag screws for hip fracture fixation: Evaluation of migration resistance under simulated walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 23(6), 1329–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2005.05.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free