Lead concentrations in human plasma, urine and whole blood

63Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. Blood-lead levels (B-Pb), and to some extent urinary lead (U-Pb), are the most employed measures of lead exposure and risk. However, the small fraction of lead present in plasma (usually below 1% of that in blood) is probably more relevant to lead exposure and toxicity. Nevertheless, the lead content of plasma lead (P-Pb) has only seldom been used, mainly due to analytical limitations, which have now been overcome. We examined P-Pb in occupationally exposed subjects, as well as its relationship with B-Pb and U-Pb. Methods. Blood samples were obtained from 145 male workers, 110 of whom were employed in lead work. After a simple dilution of plasma, P-Pb was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The detection limit was 0.04 μg/l, and the imprecision was 5%. Results. The lead concentration ranges were 0.20-37 μg/l for P-Pb, 0.9-176 μg/l (density adjusted) for U-Pb, and 9-930 μg/l for B-Pb. A close exponential relation was obtained between B-Pb and P-Pb. When B-Pb was plotted versus log P-Pb, a straight line (log P-Pb = 0.00225 B-Pb - 0.58; r = 0.97) was obtained. Both the relation between U-Pb and P-Pb and that between U-Pb and B-Pb showed a large scattering (r = 0.78 in both cases). The relation to B-Pb appeared to be exponential, while that to P-Pb appeared to be linear. Conclusions. The low detection limit and good precision of P-Pb determinations make it possible to use P-Pb in assessments of lead exposure and risk. Furthermore, in relative terms, P-Pb is a more sensitive measure than B-Pb, especially at high lead levels. This development is of importance for studies of exposure, possibly also for studies of risks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergdahl, I. A., Schütz, A., Gerhardsson, L., Jensen, A., & Skerfving, S. (1997). Lead concentrations in human plasma, urine and whole blood. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 23(5), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free