Local multi-channel RF surface coil versus body RF coil transmission for cardiac magnetic resonance at 3 tesla: Which configuration is winning the game?

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Copyright © 2016 Weinberger et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of cardiac MR at 3 Tesla using local four-channel RF coil transmission and benchmark it against large volume body RF coil excitation. Methods: Electromagnetic field simulations are conducted to detail RF power deposition, transmission field uniformity and efficiency for local and body RF coil transmission. For both excitation regimes transmission field maps are acquired in a human torso phantom. For each transmission regime flip angle distributions and blood-myocardium contrast are examined in a volunteer study of 12 subjects. The feasibility of the local transceiver RF coil array for cardiac chamber quantification at 3 Tesla is demonstrated. Results: Our simulations and experiments demonstrate that cardiac MR at 3 Tesla using four-channel surface RF coil transmission is competitive versus current clinical CMR practice of large volume body RF coil transmission. The efficiency advantage of the 4TX/4RX setup facilitates shorter repetition times governed by local SAR limits versus body RF coil transmission at whole-body SAR limit. No statistically significant difference was found for cardiac chamber quantification derived with body RF coil versus four-channel surface RF coil transmission. Our simulation also show that the body RF coil exceeds local SAR limits by a factor of ∼2 when driven at maximum applicable input power to reach the whole-body SAR limit. Conclusion: Pursuing local surface RF coil arrays for transmission in cardiac MR is a conceptually appealing alternative to body RF coil transmission, especially for patients with implants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weinberger, O., Winter, L., Dieringer, M. A., Els, A., Oezerdem, C., Rieger, J., … Niendorf, T. (2016). Local multi-channel RF surface coil versus body RF coil transmission for cardiac magnetic resonance at 3 tesla: Which configuration is winning the game? PLoS ONE, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161863

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free