Measurement of cardiac index by transpulmonary thermodilution using an implanted central venous access port: A prospective study in patients scheduled for oncologic high-risk surgery

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Transpulmonary thermodilution allows the measurement of cardiac index for high risk surgical patients. Oncologic patients often have a central venous access (port-a-catheter) for chronic treatment. The validity of the measurement by a port-a-catheter of the absolute cardiac index and the detection of changes in cardiac index induced by fluid challenge are unknown. Methods: We conducted a monocentric prospective study. 27 patients were enrolled. 250 ml colloid volume expansions for fluid challenge were performed during ovarian cytoreductive surgery. The volume expansion-induced changes in cardiac index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution by a central venous access (CIcvc) and by a port-a-catheter (CIport) were recorded. Results: 23 patients were analyzed with 123 pairs of measurements. Using a Bland and Altman for repeated measurements, the bias (lower and upper limits of agreement) between CIport and CIcvc was 0.14 (-0.59 to 0.88) L/min/m2. The percentage error was 22%. The concordance between the changes in CIport and CIcvc observed during volume expansion was 92% with an r = 0.7 (with exclusion zone). No complications (included sepsis) were observed during the follow up period. Conclusions: The transpulmonary thermodilution by a port-a-catheter is reliable for absolute values estimation of cardiac index and for measurement of the variation after fluid challenge. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02063009. © 2014 Suria et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suria, S., Wyniecki, A., Eghiaian, A., Monnet, X., & Weil, G. (2014). Measurement of cardiac index by transpulmonary thermodilution using an implanted central venous access port: A prospective study in patients scheduled for oncologic high-risk surgery. PLoS ONE, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free