Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors

6Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many organizations have employed the concepts of [`]asset specificity' and [`]uncertainty' from transaction cost theory (TCT), and [`]strategic resources' from the resource-based view (RBV) as drivers of their information systems (ISs) sourcing decisions. They, however, face a dilemma when TCT and the RBV suggest different sourcing alternatives. The study identifies contexts where sourcing decisions made based on these two theories differ, and examines which theory accounts better for an organization's sourcing decisions. Results show that a high-specificity asset is a major driver of sourcing decisions. It overpowers the effects of uncertainty on sourcing decisions; while a non-strategic resource has no impact on sourcing decisions. In particular, where the two theories make conflicting predictions, organizations should not always outsource non-strategic resources. Non-strategic resources that involve high specificity should be retained internally. The paper concludes with implications for academics and practitioners, and a discussion of future research directions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2005, May). Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(3), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4861393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free