Percutaneous radiofrequency septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in children

44Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in children. Background: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is an uncommon cause of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in children. In symptomatic patients, open heart surgical myectomy has hitherto been the only therapeutic option. Methods: In 32 children, at a median age of 11.1 (range 2.9 to 17.5) years and weight of 31 (15 to 68) kg, ablation of the hypertrophied septum was performed using a cool-tip ablation catheter via a femoral arterial approach. The median number of lesions was 27 (10 to 63) and fluoroscopic time was 24 (12 to 60) min. Results: The majority of patients demonstrated an immediate decrease in the catheter pullback gradient (mean 78.5 ± 26.2 mm Hg pre-RFCA versus mean 36.1 ± 16.5 mm Hg post-RFCA, p < 0.01) and a further reduction in the Doppler echocardiographic gradient (mean 96.9 ± 27.0 mm Hg pre-RFCA versus 32.7 ± 27.1 mm Hg post-RFCA, p < 0.01) at follow-up. One patient died due to a paradoxical increase in left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and another had persistent atrioventricular block that required permanent pacing. Six patients required further procedures (surgery, pacing, or further RFCA) during a median follow-up of 48 (3 to 144) months. Conclusions: The preliminary results of RFCA for septal reduction in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are promising and merit further evaluation. © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sreeram, N., Emmel, M., & De Giovanni, J. V. (2011). Percutaneous radiofrequency septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in children. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 58(24), 2501–2510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free