Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy

  • Funck E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the points on which researchers agree is the centrality of auton- omy to professionalism. Moreover, a common conclusion in the studies of profes- sions is that the profound changes in society over the last fifty years have threatened the autonomy and changed the archetype of professionalism. This paper contributes to the research on changes and continuities, challenges and opportunities for professionalism by discussing advantages and disadvantages of restricted professional autonomy. By describing the historical development in the Swedish and Canadian healthcare context, two major findings are discussed. First, although medical professionals have been subjected to certain constraints, they still appear to maintain a relatively high level of autonomy concerning the technical content of the work. Second, restricting professional autonomy is not negative merely due to the preservation of the professional archetype; rather, a «reason- able» limitation can be positive if professional autonomy is understood as a contract based on public trust. Keywords:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Funck, E. (2013). Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy. Professions and Professionalism, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free