Prosocial behavior and gender

  • Espinosa M
  • Kovářík J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study revisits different experimental data sets that explore social behavior in economic games and uncovers that many treatment effects may be gender-specific. In general, men and women do not differ in “neutral” baselines. However, we find that social framing tends to reinforce prosocial behavior in women but not men, whereas encouraging reflection decreases the prosociality of males but not females. The treatment effects are sometimes statistically different across genders and sometimes not but never go in the opposite direction. These findings suggest that (i) the social behavior of both sexes is malleable but each gender responds to different aspects of the social context; and (ii) gender differences observed in some studies might be the result of particular features of the experimental design. Our results contribute to the literature on prosocial behavior and may improve our understanding of the origins of human prosociality. We discuss the possible link between the observed differential treatment effects across genders and the differing male and female brain network connectivity, documented in recent neural studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Espinosa, M. P., & KováÅTMík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free