Public or private magnetic resonance imaging: What do the patients think?

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


Purpose: We described the demographic, clinical, and attitudinal profiles of patients awaiting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a private and at a hospital-based facility, and hypothesized that they would not differ significantly. Methods: A survey of patients attending a hospital facility and a privately owned venue in an Ontario city. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 314 patients provided data, with a higher response rate at the private clinic than at the hospital-based clinic (97% vs 60%). For the majority of patients (58%), the MRI was scheduled to follow up known disease; 55.8% waited more than 4 weeks; 6.4% waited more than 6 months. One-third of patients expressed a willingness to travel to the United States and pay for the MRI, 41% expressed a willingness to pay within Ontario, and 66% were willing to travel elsewhere in Ontario. They were more likely to be at the hospital-based MRI if they were being followed up for known disease and had a diagnosis of cancer, whereas those patients at the private MRI facility reported significantly more pain; 59% of the hospital-based sample and 72% of the private clinic sample reported significantly reduced quality of life because of their health problem. Discussion: These data provide interesting insights into the characteristics of patients awaiting an MRI and the attitudes of patients towards public and private MRI clinics. There were significant attitudinal differences between those patients attending the 2 facilities. Pain, coupled with a long wait, may create an incentive for patients to conclude that private clinics should be permitted if the hospital environment is unable to improve access times.




Cheng, G., Hopman, W. M., Islam, O., & Shortt, S. (2012). Public or private magnetic resonance imaging: What do the patients think? Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 63(1), 12–17.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free