Quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide

  • Rahman M
  • Kapur N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reply by the current authors to the comments made by Matthew Large & Olav Nielssen (see record 2013-38885-011) on the original article, Quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide: A pilot study (2013). Rahman et al. are grateful to Large & Nielssen for their interest in the report from the pilot study, but think they may have misunderstood its main purpose and wished to investigate the 'low risk paradox'-the fact that in the National Confidential Inquiry data, risk is nearly always reported as low prior to suicide and homicide. Rahman et al. would wholeheartedly agree with Large & Nielssen's suggestion that assessments should be compassionate, ethical and needs-focused. However, Rahman et al. would take issue with their objection to risk assessment as a whole-Rahman et al. think it is never futile and can sometimes be life-saving. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rahman, M. S., & Kapur, N. (2014). Quality of risk assessment prior to suicide and homicide. The Psychiatric Bulletin, 38(01), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.1.46b

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free