Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services

159Citations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim P, Rossbach P. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:723-9. Objectives To examine the use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and satisfaction with prosthetist services in a large and diverse sample of persons with limb loss. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General community. Participants Persons aged 18 to 84 years identified from the Amputee Coalition of America registry as having a major upper- or lower-limb loss due to vascular disease, trauma, or malignancy. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and satisfaction with prosthetists' services, assessed via structured telephone interviews. Results Most persons (94.5%) surveyed had a prosthesis and used it extensively (71h/wk). Most persons with amputations appeared to be satisfied with the overall performance of their prostheses (75.7%). Nearly one third of them, however, expressed dissatisfaction with their prostheses' comfort. Frequency of prosthesis use and satisfaction with the device were significantly higher among those with shorter timing to first prosthesis fitting, even after controlling for a wide array of respondents' sociodemographic and amputation characteristics. Overall, persons with amputations in our sample had positive assessments of their prosthetists' quality. Less favorable ratings concerned items related to the prosthetists' interpersonal skills. Multivariate analyses showed that men and black persons with amputations were less likely than their female or white counterparts to have favorable perceptions about their prosthetists across all dimensions of provider quality. Persons with fewer years of schooling were also less likely to be satisfied with their prosthetist's interpersonal manner. There were no significant differences in prosthesis use, satisfaction, or assessment of prosthetists' quality based on amputation etiology or amputation level. Conclusions Efforts should be directed at minimizing the interval from surgery to first prosthesis fitting and at improving communication between patients and prosthetists, to improve the quality of care provided to the growing numbers of persons with limb loss. © 2004 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pezzin, L. E., Dillingham, T. R., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P., & Rossbach, P. (2004). Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(5), 723–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free