Simulators in the urological training armamentarium: A boon or a bane?

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Simulation devices have grasped the attention of almost all industries worldwide and the medical field has not been exempt. With technological advancement, it becomes important to assess whether medical simulators are the way forward as an adjunct or as a replacement to traditional training approaches by assessing their safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness, and whether they should be made mandatory in the curriculum of urology training. The present review aims to clarify some of these issues, as well as assess their role in urological training and present both the pros and cons of this simulation-based training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aggarwal, G., & Adhikary, S. D. (2017, June 1). Simulators in the urological training armamentarium: A boon or a bane? Arab Journal of Urology. Arab Association of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.01.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free