Social justice and public cooperation intention: Mediating role of political trust and moderating effect of outcome dependence

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cooperation is vital to human evolution and the development of society. In addition, social justice is one of humanity's long pursuits. Based on social exchange theory and system justification theory, we built and tested a comprehensive mediated moderation model of the relationship between social justice and public cooperation intention via the mediation of political trust and with the moderation of outcome dependence. This research consisted of two studies using laboratory experiment (N = 320) and field survey (N = 1240) methods. Data were collected from participants located in China. The results showed that (1) both competence-based trust and motive-based trust mediated the relationship between social justice (i.e., distributive justice and procedural justice) and public cooperation intention; (2) outcome dependence moderated the relationship between social justice and public cooperation intention; and (3) the moderation of outcome dependence functioned through the mediating effect of competence-based and motive-based trust. The theoretical and practical significance of these findings is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, S., & Zhou, J. (2018). Social justice and public cooperation intention: Mediating role of political trust and moderating effect of outcome dependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(AUG). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free