N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the present study we propose a solution for a common problem in<br />benchmarking tasks at institutional level. The usage of bibliometric<br />indicators, even after standardisation, cannot disguise that comparing<br />institutes remains often like comparing apples with pears. We developed<br />a model to assign institutes to one of 8 different groups based on<br />their research profile. Each group has a different focus: 1. Biology,<br />2. Agricultural Sciences, 3. Multidisciplinary, 4. Geo & Space Sciences,<br />5. Technical and natural Sciences, 6. Chemistry, 7. General and Research<br />Medicine, 8. Specialised Medicine. Two applications of this methodology<br />are described. In the first application we compare the composition<br />of clusters at national level with the national research profiles.<br />This gives a deeper insight in the national research landscape. In<br />a second application we look at the dynamics of institutes by comparing<br />their subject clustering at two different points in time. © 2007<br />Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thijs, B. . c, & Glänzel, W. . b. (2008). A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0214-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free