Systematic review of beating heart surgery with the Octopus® Tissue Stabilizer

22Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery with the aid of the Octopus® Tissue Stabilizer (Octopus OPCAB), in comparison to conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CPB-CABG), was examined by a systematic assessment of the peer-reviewed literature. The limited comparative data suggested that there was no difference in safety outcomes between Octopus OPCAB and CPB-CABG. The paucity of efficacy data reported in the higher level comparative studies meant that it was impossible to assess whether Octopus OPCAB was more efficacious than CPB-CABG. The evidence base for the procedure was deemed inadequate and an audit of the procedure was recommended. Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, N. A., Knight, J. L., Bidstrup, B. P., Wolfenden, H., Linacre, R. N., & Maddern, G. J. (2002). Systematic review of beating heart surgery with the Octopus® Tissue Stabilizer. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 21(5), 804–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00075-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free