Temporal trends in sudden unexpected death in a general population: The hisayama study

15Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Studies addressing the temporal trends in the prevalence of sudden unexpected death (SUD) and its underlying causes in the general population are limited. Methods Among a total of 1934 residents aged 20 years of the town of Hisayama, Japan, who died of endogenous causes of death and underwent autopsy examination (autopsy rate 78.5%) from 1962 to 2009, 204 were determined to be cases of SUD within 24 hours. Results The trend in the age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of SUD among all autopsy subjects was stable over four 12-year periods (13.1% in 1962-1973, 13.4% in 1974-1985, 15.0% in 1986-1997, and 14.6% in 1998-2009; P for trend = .80). Regarding causes of death, the prevalence of SUD from stroke significantly declined with time (8.0%, 5.0%, 2.3%, and 2.1%, respectively; P for trend>.001), whereas significant increments were observed in the prevalence of SUD from heart disease (4.0%, 6.2%, 8.6%, and 9.7%; P for trend = .02) and from aortic aneurysm and dissection (0.2%, 1.2%, 2.9%, and 2.8%; P for trend = .01). In particular, the prevalence of ischemic heart disease increased 3-fold from 2.1% in 1962-1973 to 6.6% in 1998-2009 (P = .04). Reflecting the increment of ischemic heart disease, SUD within 1 hour increased significantly from 2.5% to 7.6% during this period (P = .01). Conclusions The trend in the prevalence of SUD was stable across a half century in a general Japanese population. Despite the decrement in the prevalence of SUD from stroke, that from heart disease, especially ischemic heart disease, increased significantly with time. (Am Heart J 2013;165:932-938.e1.).© 2013, Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagata, M., Ninomiya, T., Doi, Y., Hata, J., Ikeda, F., Mukai, N., … Kiyohara, Y. (2013). Temporal trends in sudden unexpected death in a general population: The hisayama study. American Heart Journal, 165(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free