Testing the interaction between analytical modules: An example with Roundup Ready®soybean line GTS 40-3-2

9Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The modular approach to analysis of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) relies on the independence of the modules combined (i.e. DNA extraction and GM quantification). The validity of this assumption has to be proved on the basis of specific performance criteria.Results: An experiment was conducted using, as a reference, the validated quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) module for detection of glyphosate-tolerant Roundup Ready®GM soybean (RRS). Different DNA extraction modules (CTAB, Wizard and Dellaporta), were used to extract DNA from different food/feed matrices (feed, biscuit and certified reference material [CRM 1%]) containing the target of the real-time PCR module used for validation. Purity and structural integrity (absence of inhibition) were used as basic criteria that a DNA extraction module must satisfy in order to provide suitable template DNA for quantitative real-time (RT) PCR-based GMO analysis. When performance criteria were applied (removal of non-compliant DNA extracts), the independence of GMO quantification from the extraction method and matrix was statistically proved, except in the case of Wizard applied to biscuit. A fuzzy logic-based procedure also confirmed the relatively poor performance of the Wizard/biscuit combination.Conclusions: For RRS, this study recognises that modularity can be generally accepted, with the limitation of avoiding combining highly processed material (i.e. biscuit) with a magnetic-beads system (i.e. Wizard). © 2010 Bellocchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellocchi, G., De Giacomo, M., Foti, N., Mazzara, M., Palmaccio, E., Savini, C., … Van den Eede, G. (2010). Testing the interaction between analytical modules: An example with Roundup Ready®soybean line GTS 40-3-2. BMC Biotechnology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-10-55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free