Three-dimensional echocardiography is superior to multiplane transoesophageal echo in the assessment of regurgitant valve morphology

73Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) plays a vital role in the assessment of mitral valve morphology. However, the accuracy of TOE may be limited by inadequate recognition of all segments. We aimed to evaluate the role of three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography in this respect. Methods and results. Seventy-five patients were studied prior to mitral valve repair surgery. A scoring protocol was devised for recognition of the eight Carpentier segments (0 = inadequate for analysis, 1 = adequate, 2 = good). Using surgical findings as the gold standard, TOE and 3D were compared for adequate recognition scores and accurate detection of functional morphology. Adequate recognition was more frequently obtained with 3D imaging (97% of segments by 3D c.f. 90% by TOE; p = 0.000). The major difference was seen at the commissures (adequate scores in 143/150 commissures by 3D c.f. 90/150 by TOE; p<0.000). 3D matched more closely to surgical findings, achieving exact functional description in 92% of segments vs 79% segments with TOE (p = 0.000). This incremental value of 3D was seen in both commissures and the anterior leaflet but not in the posterior leaflet. Conclusions. In this study 3D was superior not only for complete recognition of the mitral valve but also for the accurate localisation and identification of pathology. © 2004 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Macnab, A., Jenkins, N. P., Bridgewater, B. J. M., Hooper, T. L., Greenhalgh, D. L., Patrick, M. R., & Ray, S. G. (2004). Three-dimensional echocardiography is superior to multiplane transoesophageal echo in the assessment of regurgitant valve morphology. European Journal of Echocardiography, 5(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2004.01.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free