The use of tonometry to predict mortality in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability of intramucosal pH (pHi) of the sigmoid colon, IL-6 concentration and the APACHE II score in predicting outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Design: Prospective study. Methods: In 42 patients, measurements were made of the sigmoid pHi with the silicone tonometer and plasma IL-6 by enzyme linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA). The daily postoperative APACHE II scores were also calculated. In 29 patients a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by gated radionuclide angiography. Results: Four out of 42 patients who were studied died. The lowest perioperative pHi, the peak postoperative IL-6 concentration and APACHE II scores were significantly different in the survivors in comparison to the non-survivors. In the non-survivors, the fall in pHi preceded the time of patient's demise by at least 4 days. Significant correlations were observed between changes in pHi, IL-6 and APACHE II. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, pHi was shown to be the most predictive of mortality compared to the other variables. The simplicity, speed and practicality of using the tonometer adds to its superiority over the latter measurements. No relationship was found between ventricular ejection fraction, pHi and outcome. Conclusion: Although the number of patients is small, these results support pHi as a valuable predictor of outcome and also suggest a role for the gut in initiating the IL-6 and physiological responses.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soong, C. V., Halliday, M. I., Hood, J. M., Rowlands, B. J., & Barros D’Sa, A. A. B. (1998). The use of tonometry to predict mortality in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 15(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(98)80068-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free