Validity and reliability of two alternate versions of the montreal cognitive assessment (Hong Kong version) for screening of mild neurocognitive disorder

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Repeated testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) increases risks for practice effects which may bias measurements of cognitive change. The objective of this study is to develop two alternate versions of the MoCA (Hong Kong version; HK-MoCA) and to investigate the validity and reliability of the alternate versions in patients with DSM-5 Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (Mild NCD) and cognitively healthy controls. Methods Concurrent validity and inter-scale agreement were examined by Pearson correlation of the total scores between the original and alternate versions and the Bland-Altman Method. Criterion validity of the two alternate versions in differentiating patients with Mild NCD was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. One-month test-retest and inter-rater reliability were examined in 20 participants. Internal consistency of the alternate versions was measured by the Cronbach’s α. Results 30 controls (age 73.4 [4.5] years, 60% female) and 30 patients (age 75.4 [5.5] years, 73% female) with Mild NCD were recruited. Both alternate versions significantly correlated with the original version (r = 0.79–0.87, p<0.001). Mean differences of 0.17 and -0.40 points were found between the total scores of the alternate with the original versions with a consistent level of agreement observed throughout the range of cognitive abilities. Both alternate versions significantly differentiated patients with Mild NCD from healthy controls (area under ROC 0.922 and 0.724, p<0.001) and showed good one-month test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation [ICC] = 0.92 and 0.82) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99 and 0.87) and high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.79 and 0.75). Conclusion The two alternate versions of the HK-MoCA are useful for Mild NCD screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, A., Yiu, S., Nasreddine, Z., Leung, K. tat, Lau, A., Soo, Y. O. Y., … Mok, V. (2018). Validity and reliability of two alternate versions of the montreal cognitive assessment (Hong Kong version) for screening of mild neurocognitive disorder. PLoS ONE, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free