The chesapeake bay toxics issue revisited

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE<br />Declines in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Canada and in the United States have been widely attributed to the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. This article reviews changes in screening and introduction of HPV vaccination. <br /><br />METHOD<br />Sentinel events in cervical cancer screening and primary prevention through HPV vaccination in the US and Canada are described. <br /><br />RESULTS<br />Despite commonalities, cervical cancer screening and prevention differ between the two countries. Canada has a combination of opportunistic and organized programs at the provincial and territorial level, while the US has opportunistic screening and vaccination systems. In the US, the HPV test along with the Pap test (co-testing) is part of national recommendations for routine cervical cancer screening for women age 30 and older. Co-testing is not being considered anywhere in Canada, but primary HPV testing is currently recommended (but not implemented) in one province in Canada. <br /><br />CONCLUSION<br />Many prevention strategies are available for cervical cancer. Continued public health efforts should focus on increasing vaccine coverage in the target age groups and cervical cancer screening for women at appropriate intervals. Ongoing evaluation will be needed to ensure appropriate use of health resources, as vaccinated women become eligible for screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, D. A. (1991). The chesapeake bay toxics issue revisited. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 22(10), 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(91)90401-D

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free