Dose reduction in 256-slice triple rule-out CT angiography

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Triple rule-out (TRO) computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a protocol which allows evaluation of coronary arteries, aorta, pulmonary arteries and adjacent intrathoracic structures for patients with acute chest pain. Retrospective ECG-gated (RGH) is generally used for TRO CTA while the feasibility of using ECG-gated tube current modulation (ETCM) or prospective ECG-triggering (PGT) protocols have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study is to investigate the potential for dose reduction through the use of ETCM and PGT in TRO CTA examination as compared with routine RGH protocols. Material and methods: All TRO CTA examinations were performed on a 256-slice CT scanner using an anthropomorphic phantom. To determine equivalent doses for different organs, thermal-luminance dosimeters (TLDs) were placed in different positions in the organs during the scanning and effective doses were calculated based on ICRP-103 guidelines. Effective doses calculated from volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were also compared with those obtained from TLD measurements. Results: From the study, the mean effective dose for RGH, ETCM and PGT scanning was 21.54 mSv, 15.52 mSv and 10.75 mSv respectively. The doses for ETCM and PGT techniques were significantly reduced by 27% and 50% (p < 0.01) as compared to that for RGH. Effective doses calculated from CTDI method for three protocols were no significantly difference compared with those obtained from TLD measurements. Conclusion: Radiation dose could be efficiently reduced by applying the ETCM and PGT protocols in the 256-slice TRO CTA examinations. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, C. J., Chen, L. K., Mok, G. S. P., Wu, T. H., & Lee, J. J. S. (2011). Dose reduction in 256-slice triple rule-out CT angiography. In Radiation Measurements (Vol. 46, pp. 2065–2068). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.06.070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free