Putative inhibitory training of a stimulus makes it a facilitator: A within-subject comparison of visual and auditory stimuli in autoshaping

  • Nakajima S
  • 3

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 1

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Pigeons were trained with the A+, AB-, ABC+, AD- and ADE+ task where each of stimulus A and stimulus compounds ABC and ADE signalled food (positive trials), and each of stimulus compounds AB and AD signalled no food (negative trials). Stimuli A, B, C and E were small visual figures localised on a response key, and stimulus D was a white noise. Stimulus B was more effective than D as an inhibitor of responding to A during the training. After the birds learned to respond exclusively on the positive trials, effects of B and D on responding to C and E, respectively, were tested by comparing C, BC, E and DE trials. Stimulus B continuously facilitated responding to C on the BC test trials, but D's facilitative effect was observed only on the first DE test trial. Stimulus B also facilitated responding to E on BE test trials. Implications for the Rescorla-Wagner elemental model and the Pearce configural model of Pavlovian conditioning were discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Autoshaping
  • Discrimination learning
  • Pigeon
  • Stimulus configuration
  • The Pearce model
  • The Rescorla-Wagner model

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Sadahiko Nakajima

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free