Recoil velocity-dependent spin-orbit state distribution of chlorine photofragments

  • Schäfer L
  • Gödecke N
  • Ott O
 et al. 
  • 4


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 6


    Citations of this article.


We present the results of experimental and theoretical studies of the speed-dependent spin-orbit state distributions of chlorine photofragments produced in the photodissociation of thiophosgene (CSCl2) at 235 nm. Three-dimensional imaging has been employed for observing chlorine photofragments in their ground (Cl) and excited (Cl*) spin-orbit states. The kinetic energy distributions for Cl and Cl* fragments reflect excitation of several electronic states of the partner fragment CSCl. The spin-orbit branching ratio of P(Cl*)/[P(Cl)+P(Cl*)] was found to depend on the kinetic recoil energy increasing from 0.1 for low kinetic energy to 0.8 for high kinetic energy. The theoretical interpretation is based on the computation of the CSCl2potential energy surfaces (PES) along the C-Cl bond. Two completely different methods of determination of the PES were applied for small and for large values of the C-Cl bond separation R. In case of small and intermediate R values time-dependent density-functional theory has been used. In case of large R values we used an asymptotic method of computation of the PES, which is a generalisation of the Heitler-London approach for many-electron systems. Basis molecular wavefunctions with definite values of the total spin S and the spatial and spin reflection symmetry σvwith respect to reflection of the total electronic wavefunction in the molecular plane were used. The developed theoretical approach was used for the assignment of the molecular states involved in the photodissociation and for the qualitative explanation of the non-statistical population of the spin-orbit states of the chlorine photofragments as function of the kinetic energy. The spin-orbit branching ratio of P(Cl*)/[P(Cl)+P(Cl*)] predicted by the theory strongly depends on the quantum state of the CSCl fragment. It is large in case of the CSCl(X̃)+Cl and CSCl(Ã)+Cl channels and small in case of the CSCl(B̃)+Cl channel which explains the experimental results. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free