3-D / 2-D Registration of CT and MR to X-Ray Images

  • Tomazevic D
  • Likar B
  • Slivnik T
 et al. 
  • 53

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

A crucial part of image-guided therapy is registration of preoperative and intraoperative images, by which the precise position and orientation of the patient’s anatomy is determined in three dimensions. This paper presents a novel approach to register three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images to one or more two-dimensional (2-D) X-ray images. The registration is based solely on the information present in 2-D and 3-D images. It does not require fiducial markers, intraoperative X-ray image segmentation, or timely construction of digitally reconstructed radiographs. The originality of the approach is in using normals to bone surfaces, preoperatively defined in 3-D MR or CT data, and gradients of intraoperative X-ray images at locations defined by the X-ray source and 3-D surface points. The registration is concerned with finding the rigid transformation of a CT or MR volume, which provides the best match between surface normals and back projected gradients, considering their amplitudes and orientations. We have thoroughly validated our registration method by using MR, CT, and X-ray images of a cadaveric lumbar spine phantom for which “gold standard” registration was established by means of fiducial markers, and its accuracy assessed by target registration error. Volumes of interest, containing single vertebrae L1–L5, were registered to different pairs of X-ray images from different starting positions, chosen randomly and uniformly around the “gold standard” position. CT/X-ray (MR/X-ray) registration, which is fast, was successful in more than 91% (82% except for L1) of trials if started from the “gold standard” translated or rotated for less than 6 mm or 17 (3 mm or 8.6 ), respectively. Root-mean-square target registration errors were below 0.5 mm for the CT to X-ray registration and below 1.4 mm for MR to X-ray registration.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 3-D/2-D image registration
  • X-ray projections
  • computed tomography
  • image-guided therapy
  • magnetic
  • resonance
  • spine phantom
  • “gold standard”

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Dejan Tomazevic

  • Bostjan Likar

  • Tomaz Slivnik

  • Franjo Pernus

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free