Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic?

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Elliott Sober (1987, 1993) and Orzack and Sober (forthcoming) argue that adaptationism is a very general hypothesis that can be tested by testing various particular hypotheses that invoke natural selection to explain the presence of traits in populations of organisms. In this paper, I challenge Sober's claim that adaptationism is an hypothesis and I argue that it is best viewed as a heuristic (or research strategy). Biologists would still have good reasons for employing this research strategy even if it turns out that natural selection is not the most important cause of evolution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Resnik, D. (1996). Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic? Biology and Philosophy, 12(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936706537

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free