The Adaptive Toolbox and Lifespan Development: Common Questions?

  • Gigerenzer G
  • 8

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the relationship between the vision of bounded rationality as an adaptive toolbox (e.g., Gigerenzer, Todd, & the ABC Research Group, 1999) and the vision of development as selection-optimization-compensation (Baltes, 1997, this volume). Both approaches are metatheories that advise us as to what questions to ask and what kinds of models to build. Both have an affinity for the use of evolutionary thinking as a guideline for what problems to address. Beyond this, however, are there similar ideas? Contradictions? And most important, is there a fruitful transfer of ideas and questions?

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Authors

  • Gerd Gigerenzer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free