The Adaptive Toolbox and Lifespan Development: Common Questions?

  • Gigerenzer G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the relationship between the vision of bounded rationality as an adaptive toolbox (e.g., Gigerenzer, Todd, & the ABC Research Group, 1999) and the vision of development as selection-optimization-compensation (Baltes, 1997, this volume). Both approaches are metatheories that advise us as to what questions to ask and what kinds of models to build. Both have an affinity for the use of evolutionary thinking as a guideline for what problems to address. Beyond this, however, are there similar ideas? Contradictions? And most important, is there a fruitful transfer of ideas and questions?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gigerenzer, G. (2003). The Adaptive Toolbox and Lifespan Development: Common Questions? In Understanding Human Development (pp. 423–435). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0357-6_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free