The adequacy of GWPs as indicators of damage costs incurred by global warming

  • Sygna L
  • Fuglestvedt J
  • Aaheim H
  • 10

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 10

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This article looks at the ability of Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) to work as indicators of equivalence for temperature development and damage costs. We look at two abatement scenarios that are equivalent when using 100-year GWPs: one scenario reduces short-lived gases, mainly methane (CH4); the other scenario reduces carbon dioxide (CO2). Despite their equivalence in terms of CO2 equivalents, the scenarios do not result in equal rates or levels of temperature change. The disparities continue as we move further down the chain of causality toward damage costs, measured either in terms of rate of climate change or level of climate change. Compared to the CH4 mitigation scenario, the CO2 mitigation scenario gives present value costs 1.3 and 1.5 times higher for level- and rate-dependent damage costs, respectively, assuming a discount rate of 3%. We also test the GWPs for other time horizons and the conclusions remain the same; using GWP as an index to reflect equivalent climate effects and damage costs from emissions is questionable.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Abatement scenarios
  • CO2equivalents
  • Climate change
  • Damage costs
  • GWP

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Linda Sygna

  • Jan S. Fuglestvedt

  • H. Asbjørn Aaheim

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free