Anosognosia and denial: Their relationship to coping and depression in acquired brain injury

  • Kortte K
  • Wegener S
  • Chwalisz K
  • 36

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 46

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate relations among denial, anosognosia, coping strategies, and depression in persons with brain injury. Study Design: Correlational. Setting: A Midwest residential, post–acute brain injury rehabilitation center. Participants: Twenty-seven adults with brain injury. Measures: Clinician’s Rating Scale for Evaluating Impaired Self-Awareness and Denial of Disability After Brain Injury, COPE, Beck Depression Inventory—II. Results: Denial and anosognosia were related and co-occurred. Use of process coping strategies was associated with greater use of problem-focused coping strategies. Higher levels of denial were associated with greater use of avoidant coping strategies, and greater use of these coping strategies was related to higher levels of depression. Conclusions: Individuals primarily in denial and individuals primarily anosognosic differ in the coping strategies they institute. Avoidant coping strategies are used more frequently by individuals in denial, and use of these strategies is associated with higher levels of clinical depression.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Kathleen Bechtold Kortte

  • Stephen T. Wegener

  • Kathleen Chwalisz

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free