Skip to content

Antioxidant defense and aging in C. elegans: Is the oxidative damage theory of aging wrong?

Gems D, Doonan R...(+2 more)

Cell Cycle, vol. 8, issue 11 (2009) pp. 1681-1687

  • 77


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference


The oxidative damage theory of aging once seemed almost proven. Yet recently the buzzards have been assembling in the blue skies above it. New challenges to the theory from work using nematode worms seem set to bring them down to peck at its bones. But is the theory really dead, or does it just need to be modified?

Author-supplied keywords

  • Aging
  • Antioxidant
  • C. elegans
  • Catalase
  • Free radical
  • Nematode
  • Oxidative stress
  • ROS
  • Superoxide dismutase
  • Theory

Find this document

Get full text

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below