In this paper we are interested in empirical likelihood (EL) as a method of estimation, and we address the following two problems: (1) selecting among various empirical discrepancies in an EL framework and (2) demonstrating that EL has a well-defined probabilistic interpretation that would justify its use in a Bayesian context. using the large deviations approach, a Bayesian law of large numbers is developed that implies that EL and the Bayesian maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) estimators are consistent under mis-specification and that EL can be viewed as an asymptotic form of MAP. Estimators based on other empirical discrepancies are, in general, inconsistent under misspecification. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009.
CITATION STYLE
Grendár, M., & Judge, G. (2009). Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and bayesian map. Annals of Statistics, 37(5 A), 2445–2457. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOS645
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.