Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures

  • Roberts C
  • Parker M
  • 12

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 15

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

We studied the outcome of 100 uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasties used as a revision procedure for failed osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral fractures. This group was compared with 730 patients in whom an uncemented Austin-Moore prosthesis had been used as the primary treatment for an intracapsular femoral fracture. The results indicate that the study group had more pain at 1-year post-fracture. There were also significantly more revision procedures in those who had the arthroplasty performed as a salvage procedure. In general, the results of uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty used as a revision procedure for failed osteosynthesis are inferior to that for primary hemiarthroplasty. We would advocate that for any case in which there are signs of acetabular damage a total hip replacement might be a better procedure. For the remainder, an alternative arthroplasty should be considered with an uncemented Austin-Morre prosthesis reserved for only the very frail. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • C. Roberts

  • M. J. Parker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free