Automated exploration and inspection: Comparing two visual novelty detectors

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mobile robot applications that involve exploration and inspection of dynamic environments benefit, and often even are dependant on reliable novelty detection algorithms. In this paper we compare and discuss the performance and functionality of two different on-line novelty detection algorithms, one based on incremental Principal Component Analysis and the other on a Grow-When-Required artificial neural network. A series of experiments using visual input obtained by a mobile robot interacting with laboratory and real-world environments demonstrate and measure advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vieira Neto, H., & Nehmzow, U. (2005). Automated exploration and inspection: Comparing two visual novelty detectors. In International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems (Vol. 2, pp. 355–362). https://doi.org/10.5772/5770

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free