This paper examines the politics of contemporary encampment within the UK with reference to the positioning of asylum seekers as a group subjected to a biopolitical logic of 'compassionate repression'. The paper opens by examining the utility of presentations of the asylum seeker as an exemplar of Agamben's figure�of the homo sacer. Drawing on recent critiques of the British government's apparent turn to a 'deliberate policy of destitution', I argue that through such acts of sovereign abandonment asylum seekers are relegated to a position reliant solely upon the ethical sensibilities of others. I then proceed to consider ways in which such a positioning 'outside the law' has been employed by asylum seekers and local campaigners to make ethical claims and demands upon the relational nature of the citizen as a figure�of potential bare life. I then close by arguing that such an ethical gesture alone, of 'assuming bare life', is not enough and that the outright rejection of logics of distinction which Agamben suggests as a future politics offers little means to politically engage bare life beyond an irreconcilable ethic of the unconditionally hospitable. Opposed to this, I suggest the need to (re)engage with political theories which draw the political as always already an ethical practice in itself. Here, I examine the UK's involvement in the UNHCR Gateway Protection Programme, as an example of a conditional, and imperfect, act of hospitality, one grounded in distinction, yet one which holds both the risks of ethical practice and the possibility of political alteration at its heart.
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research
Choose a citation style from the tabs below