Behaviorally spontaneous confabulation in limbic encephalitis: The roles of reality filtering and strategic monitoring

21Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Behaviorally spontaneous confabulation is characterized by a confusion of reality evident in currently inappropriate acts that patients justify with confabulations and in disorientation. Here, we describe a 38-year-old woman lawyer hospitalized because of non-herpetic, presumably autoimmune, limbic encephalitis. For months, she considered herself at work and desperately tried to respect her falsely believed professional obligations. In contrast to a completely erroneous concept of reality, she did not confabulate about her remote personal past. In tasks proposed to test strategic retrieval monitoring, she produced no confabulations. As expected, she failed in tasks of reality filtering, previously shown to have high sensitivity and specificity for behaviorally spontaneous confabulation and disorientation: she failed to suppress the interference of currently irrelevant memories and she had deficient extinction capacity. The observation underscores the special status of behaviorally spontaneous confabulation among confabulatory phenomena and of reality filtering as a thought control mechanism. We suggest that different processes may underlie the generation of false memories and their verbal expression. We also emphasize the need to present theories of confabulation together with experimental tasks that allow one to empirically verify the theories and to explore underlying physiological mechanisms. (JINS, 2010, 16, 995-1005.) Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nahum, L., Ptak, R., Leemann, B., Lalive, P., & Schnider, A. (2010). Behaviorally spontaneous confabulation in limbic encephalitis: The roles of reality filtering and strategic monitoring. In Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (Vol. 16, pp. 995–1005). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710000780

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free