Between regions: Science, militarism, and American geography from World War to Cold War

  • Barnes T
  • Farish M
  • 50


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 96


    Citations of this article.


Histories of American geographic thought and practice have sketched, but not critically explored, the relation- ship between war, intellectual change, and the production of spatial knowledge. This article sheds light on a crucial period, the middle decades of the twentieth century, when new modes of understanding and representing geography were being formulated at a variety of sites across the nation-state, from Princeton to the University of Washington. In particular, there emerged an altered conception of region, not as a descriptive but as a theoretical unit. This intellectual transformation, driven by an invigorated scientific imperative, was closely wedded to broader geopolitical conditions of war and militarism—to the demands for synthetic regional intelligence and new collectives of research that could adequately address complex technical and social challenges consistent with global influence. Moving from the formative hub of the Office of Strategic Services to the more diffuse but no less powerful structures of Cold War funding, we chart the emergence of a new regional model, inextricably linked and concurrent with the solidification of a world of strategic regions open to the exertion of American power, but also part of a remarkable emergent technoscientific complex at home. KeyWords: ColdWar, region, SecondWorld War, technoscience

Author-supplied keywords

  • Cold war
  • Region
  • Second world war
  • Technoscience

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Trevor J. Barnes

  • Matthew Farish

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free