Bilateral donors and aid conditionality in post-conflict peacebuilding: The case of Mozambique

32Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the role of bilateral donors and conditional aid in Mozambique's successful post-war peace process. The literature on peacebuilding has tended to privilege the role of UN missions in explaining the outcomes of post-civil war peace processes. The important role that bilateral donors may play in determining these outcomes has not been thoroughly studied. In Mozambique, donors with country experience, knowledge of domestic political actors and constraints, and a shared commitment to a successful outcome, were indispensable to the success of the peace process. The article details this engagement, arguing that it was not UNOMOZ alone, but UNOMOZ as supported by the flexible responses of these donors, that provided an effective third-party guarantee of the peace agreement in Mozambique. It briefly discusses the broader implications of this finding for understanding international peacebuilding efforts. © Cambridge University Press 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manning, C., & Malbrough, M. (2010). Bilateral donors and aid conditionality in post-conflict peacebuilding: The case of Mozambique. Journal of Modern African Studies, 48(1), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X09990255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free