Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye.

  • Westendorf D
  • 17


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 13


    Citations of this article.


Reaction time was used to gauge the sensitivity of an eye during its dominant and suppressed phases of binocular rivalry. During dominance, performance was uniformly good in detecting both stimuli that were spatially identical to the suppressed stimulus and those that were different in spatial frequency. When suppressed eyes were tested, performance was poor when the stimulus was different from the dominating stimulus, but even worse when the test stimulus and the dominating stimulus were spatially identical. The results favor the view that suppression operates nonselectively on a monocular visual channel, prior to the point at which dichoptic pattern masking occurs.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Attention
  • Discrimination Learning
  • Dominance, Cerebral
  • Form Perception
  • Humans
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Perceptual Masking
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Reaction Time
  • Vision, Binocular

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • D H Westendorf

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free