Journal article

Biocultural Dialogues : Biology and Culture in Psychological Anthropology

Hruschka D, Lende D, Worthman C ...see all

Ethos, vol. 33, issue 1 (2005) pp. 1-19

  • 50


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 19


    Citations of this article.
  • N/A


    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference


Psychological anthropology has a long history of integrative, cross-disciplinary research within the social sciences. This holistic tradition has substantially contributed to understanding the relationships between individuals and their cultural environment and to developing more sophisticated models of human variation within and between cultures. Whereas these contributions have generally arisen from conversations between psychology and anthropology, research integrating biological and cultural anthropology has become an increasingly established part of other anthropological subfields, such as medical and biological anthropology. This special issue continues psychological anthropology's commitment to holistic inquiry by examining how dialogues between biological and cultural perspectives can generate new insights when applied to key questions in psychological anthropology. The articles in this volume tackle various issues including the effect of cultural consonance on well-being in Brazil, the biocultural roots of addiction among Colombian youth, the social and psychological factors implicated in becoming a Gandomble medium, the process of coping with political-ecological inequality in Peru, and the biocultural pathways to somatization and suffering in Nepal. Not surprisingly, the research presented here has direct links to the biocultural approaches that have emerged in medical and biological anthropology. It also represents a broadening of the topics in psychological anthropology currently examined from a biocultural perspective. This article introduces these new research directions. Furthermore, it argues for the utility of psychological models in building biocultural frameworks, describes how biological and cultural anthropology can each benefit from conversations with the other, and addresses some of the theoretical, practical, and social challenges in developing and sustaining biocultural dialogues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved)

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Daniel J Hruschka

  • Daniel H Lende

  • Carol M Worthman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free