Biodiversity may represent a formof biological insurance against the loss or poor performance of selected species1 . If this is the case, then communities with larger numbers of species should be more predictablewith respect to properties such as local biomass2 . That is, larger numbers of species should enhance ecosystem reliability, where reliability refers to the probability that a system will provide a consistent level of performance over a given unit of time3 . The validity of this hypothesis has important ecological, management and economic implications given the large-scale substitution of diverse natural ecosystems with less diverse managed systems4 . No experimental evidence, however, has sup- ported this hypothesis5 . To test this hypothesis we established replicated microbial microcosmswith varying numbers of species per functional group.We found that as the number of species per functional group increased, replicate communities were more consistent in biomass and density measures. These results suggest that redundancy (in the sense of having multiple species per functional group6–8 ) is a valuable commodity, and that the provi- sion of adequate redundancy may be one reason for preserving biodiversity.
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research
Choose a citation style from the tabs below