"Blaming the victim" under memory load

  • Goldinger S
  • Kleider H
  • Azuma T
 et al. 
  • 73

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 39

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

When presented with negative outcomes, people often engage in counterfactual thinking imagining various ways that events might have been different. This appears to be a spontaneous behavior, with considerable adaptive value. Nevertheless, counterfactual thinking may also engender systematic biases in various judgment tasks, such as allocating blame for a mishap, or deciding on the appropriate compensation to a victim. Thus, counterfactuals sometimes require thought suppression or discounting, potentially resource-demanding tasks. In this study. participants made mock-jury decisions about control and counterfactual versions of simple stories. The judgments of two groups of participants, differing in their respective levels of working memory capacity, were compared. In addition, all participants held memory loads during various stages of the primary task. Lower-span individuals were especially susceptible to bias associated with the counterfactual manipulation, but only when holding memory loads during judgment. The results suggest that counterfactual thoughts arise automatically, and may later require effortful, capacity-demanding suppression.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Stephen GoldingerSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University

    Follow
  • Heather M. Kleider

  • Tamiko Azuma

  • Denise R. Beike

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free