Blood transfusion: The silent epidemic

  • Spiess B
  • 0

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 69

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Blood transfusion has been widely studied and the risk/benefit ratio remains unclear. Focus historically has been upon viral transmission, particularly hepatitis and HIV. Today, with advanced screening for these viruses, the risk for such transmission has become vanishingly small. Immunosuppression, with consequent postoperative bacterial infection and ABO incompatibility are now risks that physicians should consider as associated with allogeneic blood transfusion. Other inflammatory events, such as transfusion associated acute lung injury, also occur. The benefits of transfusion have never been well studied and there is scant literature on that area. Therefore, in an evidence-based medical practice the physician should regard transfusion with a skewed risk/benefit ratio. The following article examines that risk/benefit ratio in the post-AIDS era. © 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Bruce D. Spiess

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free