Bone quality: Educational tools for patients, physicians, and educators

  • J. S
  • A.B. S
  • A.M. K
 et al. 
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Background: Defining bone quality remains elusive. From a patient perspective bone quality can best be defined as an individual's likelihood of sustaining a fracture. Fracture risk indicators and performance measures can help clinicians better understand individual fracture risk. Educational resources such as the Web can help clinicians and patients better understand fracture risk, communicate effectively, and make decisions concerning diagnosis and treatment. Questions/purposes: We examined four questions: What tools can be used to identify individuals at high risk for fracture? What clinical performance measures are available? What strategies can help ensure that patients at risk for fracture are identified? What are some authoritative Web sites for educating providers and patients about bone quality? Methods: Using Google, PUBMED, and trademark names, we reviewed the literature using the terms "bone quality" and "osteoporosis education." Web site legitimacy was evaluated using specific criteria. Educational Web sites were limited to English-language sites sponsored by nonprofit organizations Results: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool® (FRAX®) and the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) are reliable means of assessing fracture risk. Performance measures relating to bone health were developed by the AMA convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement® and are included in the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative. In addition, quality measures have been developed by the Joint Commission. Strategies for identifying individuals at risk include designating responsibility for case finding and intervention, evaluating secondary causes of osteoporosis, educating patients and providers, performing cost-effectiveness evaluation, and using information technology. An abundance of authoritative educational Web sites exists for providers and patients. Conclusions: Effective clinical indicators, performance measures, and educational tools to better understand and identify fracture risk are now available. The next challenge is to encourage broader use of these resources so that individuals at high risk for fracture will not just be identified but will also adhere to therapy. © 2011 The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Internet
  • accreditation
  • adult
  • aged
  • bone characteristics and functions
  • bone density
  • bone examination
  • bone quality
  • clinical assessment tool
  • clinical effectiveness
  • clinical evaluation
  • conference paper
  • cost effectiveness analysis
  • dual energy X ray absorptiometry
  • female
  • fracture
  • fracture risk assessment tool
  • fracture risk calculator
  • health educator
  • high risk population
  • human
  • male
  • medical decision making
  • non profit organization
  • osteoporosis
  • patient education
  • physician
  • priority journal
  • qualitative analysis
  • risk factor
  • risk reduction
  • strategic planning

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Authors

  • Shams J.

  • Spitzer A.B.

  • Kennelly A.M.

  • Tosi L.L.

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free