Bringing in communicative rationality into design participation: a lesson from inclusive design

  • Leung K
  • Ho D
  • Ma J
 et al. 
  • 18


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 1


    Citations of this article.


This article is an attempt to examine the extent to which Bourdieu‟s concepts of field, communicative rationality and rational deliberation is useful in designing game-like activities in design participation. We attempt to advocate the idea that changing the nature of the game is crucial in our understanding of the nature of design participation. In order to do this, we should design activities which could firstly reveal the nature and rules of the design games, and sensitize participants and designers to be aware of the constraining factors that would undermine the possibility of achieving „the interest in disinterest‟ – a sentiment that would reduce the harmful effects of systematic distortion which comes from our socialization, social positions and collective learning. We also suggest that the study of body techniques to explore new domains of experience through which social inclusion is more likely to be realized. The study of the experience of two Inclusive Design workshops supports this suggestion.

Author-supplied keywords

  • body techniques
  • communicative rationality
  • design for change
  • field
  • inclusive design
  • rational deliberation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Kwok Leung

  • Denny Ho

  • Jin Ma

  • Peter C K Chuah

  • Yanki Lee

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free