Building confidence in qualitative research: Engaging the demands of policy

  • Torrance H
  • 47


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 18


    Citations of this article.


The quality of qualitative research has been subject to considerable criticism recently, partly driven by the development of an international movement for “evidence-based policy and practice.” In the United States, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are posited by some as the best way of producing reliable research knowledge. Also, responses to criticism of qualitative research is leading to the production of various “standards” and “guidelines” to control the production of qualitative research. This article argues that RCTs do not respond to policy makers' needs and timescales and, furthermore, that producing standards for qualitative research is more likely to restrict quality than enhance it. Rather, what is required of qualitative researchers is to engage with policy makers and research participants to acknowledge the limits of research knowledge while addressing issues of quality collaboratively.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Applied research
  • Knowledge production
  • Qualitative research
  • Research utility

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Harry Torrance

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free