Carbon balance gradient in European forests: Should we doubt 'surprising' results? A reply to Piovesan & Adams

  • Jarvis P
  • Dolman A
  • Schulze E
 et al. 
  • 41


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 17


    Citations of this article.


This paper responds to the Forum contribution by Piovesan & Adams (2000) who criticized the results obtained by the EUROFLUX network on carbon fluxes of several European forests. The major point of criticism was that the data provided by EUROFLUX are inconsistent with current scientific understanding. It is argued that understanding the terrestrial global carbon cycle requires more than simply restating what was known previously, and that Piovesan & Adams have not been able to show any major conflicts between our findings and ecosystem or atmospheric-transport theories

Author-supplied keywords

  • Carbon flux
  • Decomposition
  • Respiration
  • Soil organic matter

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free