Carbon capture and storage at scale: Lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies

58Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

At present carbon capture and storage (CCS) is very expensive and its performance is highly uncertain at the scale of commercial power plants. Such challenges to deployment, though, are not new to students of technological change. Several successful technologies, including energy technologies, have faced similar challenges as CCS faces now. To draw lessons for the CCS industry from the history of other energy technologies that, as with CCS today, were risky and expensive early in their commercial development, we have analyzed the development of the US nuclear-power industry, the US SO2-scrubber industry, and the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry. Through analyzing the development of the analogous industries we arrive at three principal observations. First, government played a decisive role in the development of all of these analogous technologies. Second, diffusion of these technologies beyond the early demonstration and niche projects hinged on the credibility of incentives for industry to invest in commercial-scale projects. Third, the conventional wisdom that experience with technologies inevitably reduces costs does not necessarily hold. Risky and capital-intensive technologies may be particularly vulnerable to diffusion without accompanying reductions in cost. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rai, V., Victor, D. G., & Thurber, M. C. (2010). Carbon capture and storage at scale: Lessons from the growth of analogous energy technologies. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4089–4098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free