The certainty of judgments in health evaluations

43Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Most evaluators seem to presume that all evaluative studies should result in conclusive evidence. Often, however, less than conclusive evidence may not only suffice, but be the only real alternative under conditions of limited evaluation resources. Three levels of evidence common to evaluation studies are discussed: suggestive evidence, preponderant evidence, and conclusive evidence. Ten factors are also presented which can be used to determine the level of certainty appropriate for a given evaluation study. Consideration of these factors enables the evaluator to specify when less than conclusive evidence is acceptable. © 1982.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, N. L. (1981). The certainty of judgments in health evaluations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 4(3–4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(81)90028-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free